No Harm Act
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To President
- Became Law
Overview
This bill would prevent federal funding from being used for medical gender transition treatments in minors, including puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgical procedures.
Why it matters: Christian families concerned about protecting children from irreversible medical interventions based on gender ideology would see this as directly addressing parental rights and the sanctity of childhood development.
Topic: Gender & sexuality · classifier confidence 95%
What this changes
Creates a new law or program
Law today: The bill does not spell out the prior law. It appears to address current federal funding practices without citing specific existing statutes governing federal funds and pediatric medical treatments.
If passed: If enacted, this bill would prohibit federal funds (such as Medicaid, Medicare, and research grants) from being used to pay for medical treatments that alter sex characteristics in minors. This would likely affect access to and funding for hormone therapy and surgical interventions for transgender youth, shifting some costs to families, private insurance, or states.
AI-generated from the bill text — verify against the official text.
Likely supporters & opponents
Likely support
- parental-rights and religious-liberty advocacy organizations — Parents should have authority to protect their minor children from irreversible medical interventions, and federal funds should not subsidize treatments that conflict with religious or traditional views on sex and childhood.
- medical-conservative groups and some pediatric associations — Minors cannot fully consent to permanent sex-altering treatments, and federal funds should not support experimental or disputed interventions in a developing population.
Likely opposition
- LGBTQ+ advocacy organizations and civil-liberties groups — This restricts access to medically recognized, evidence-based care for transgender youth and violates the right to equal medical treatment regardless of gender identity.
- medical associations and pediatric endocrinologists — Major medical bodies recognize these treatments as appropriate for some adolescents under careful clinical supervision, and defunding them harms vulnerable youth.
AI-inferred typical positions based on the bill’s substance — general stakeholder categories, not confirmed endorsements.
Should I support this?
Likely helpful for Christian families
From a Christian parental-rights perspective, this bill protects parental authority by restricting federal subsidy of sex-trait altering treatments for minors and aligns with traditional views on childhood and bodily integrity. However, Christian families hold diverse views on gender medicine; some may see this as compassionate protection of children, while others focused on inclusion may view it as limiting medical options.
An AI assessment from a Christian-family perspective — religious freedom, parental rights, and freedom in education — not legal or voting advice.
Official summary
To prohibit Federal funds from being used for sex-trait altering treatments for minors, and for other purposes.
Sponsors
- Robert Onder (R)
- Andy Harris (R)
- Mary Miller (R)
- Sheri Biggs (R)
- Mark Messmer (R)
- Russell Fry (R)
- Scott Franklin (R)
- Andrew Clyde (R)
- Greg Steube (R)
Status timeline
- 2025-03-26Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, Education and Workforce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.H
- 2025-03-26Introduced in HouseH
- 2025-03-26Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H1283)H
- 2025-03-26Introduced in HouseH
H = House · S = Senate · A = Assembly