My Body, My Data Act of 2025
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To President
- Became Law
Overview
This bill restricts how companies collect, use, and share personal reproductive and sexual health information; it would likely limit parents' ability to know what data their children access or share about these sensitive topics online.
Why it matters: While framed as a privacy measure, the bill could prevent parents from monitoring or understanding their children's digital activity in sexual/reproductive health contexts, potentially creating barriers to parental oversight of minors' exposure to these materials and services.
Topic: Parental rights · classifier confidence 68%
What this changes
Creates a new law or program
Law today: The bill does not spell out the prior law. Federal privacy protections for health information exist under HIPAA and related statutes, but the bill text was not provided to identify what specific gaps or concerns it addresses.
If passed: This bill would create new federal protections for personal reproductive and sexual health information, likely restricting how that data can be collected, shared, or used by companies, healthcare providers, or government agencies. For Christian families, this could affect what information schools, counselors, or medical providers can gather or share regarding reproductive or sexual health matters without parental consent or knowledge.
AI-generated from the bill text — verify against the official text.
Likely supporters & opponents
Likely support
- privacy-advocacy organizations — Personal health data, especially reproductive and sexual information, deserves strong legal protection against misuse or unauthorized sharing.
- civil-liberties groups — Individuals have a right to privacy in sensitive personal health decisions without government or corporate surveillance.
Likely opposition
- healthcare and medical associations — Overly restrictive privacy rules could impede legitimate medical research, public health efforts, or standard healthcare operations.
- law-enforcement and government agencies — Strong privacy protections might limit lawful access to health data needed for investigations or public safety purposes.
AI-inferred typical positions based on the bill’s substance — general stakeholder categories, not confirmed endorsements.
Should I support this?
Mixed for Christian families
The bill aims to protect sensitive personal data, which aligns with Christian parental interest in controlling information about their children's health and development. However, without seeing the full text, it is unclear whether the law creates carve-outs for parental consent, school notification, or other safeguards that matter to families who want transparency in their child's care and education; overly broad privacy rules could also unintentionally shield information from parents who have a right to know about their minor child's health.
An AI assessment from a Christian-family perspective — religious freedom, parental rights, and freedom in education — not legal or voting advice.
Official summary
A bill to protect the privacy of personal reproductive or sexual health information, and for other purposes.
Sponsors
- Mazie Hirono (D)
- Ron Wyden (D)
- Richard Blumenthal (D)
- Lisa Rochester (D)
- Maria Cantwell (D)
- Tammy Duckworth (D)
- Ruben Gallego (D)
- Kirsten Gillibrand (D)
- Martin Heinrich (D)
- Tim Kaine (D)
- Amy Klobuchar (D)
- Jeff Merkley (D)
- Patty Murray (D)
- Adam Schiff (D)
- Jeanne Shaheen (D)
- Tina Smith (D)
- Peter Welch (D)
- Sheldon Whitehouse (D)
- Tammy Baldwin (D)
- Angela Alsobrooks (D)
- Richard Durbin (D)
- Catherine Cortez Masto (D)
- Christopher Coons (D)
Status timeline
- 2025-06-11Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.S
H = House · S = Senate · A = Assembly